Sunday, January 13, 2008

Meeting Reminder and Location Question

The following is posted on the City's website:

COUNCIL MEETING LOCATION CHANGE: Starting Monday January 14, 2008 all public meetings will be held at the Council Chambers of City Hall, 9119 Lackland Rd. unless otherwise announced.


Don't they need a stay from a judge to change the location?

Why change this now when the community center accomodates more people, more comfortably (e.g. more accessible to the not as physcially-abled, the elderly)?

The agenda is posted online here. Most interesting things are the settlements with the cellular companies (money everyone is salivating to spend) and a bill for trash assistance to members of the community.

6 comments:

ORT Contrarian said...

Ol' Empty thinks he above things such as following court orders. Or following campaign finance laws. Or courtesies such as informing the council before you inform the press.
Really, put a blonde wig on him and he's Anne Puzner!

PTT said...

The difference is that Purzner was actually trying to do something.

MTSuit has been in office for six months or so and I can't think of anything significant that he has accomplished.

Sure anyone can for committees stocked with local political hacks, but that doesn't equate with an accomplishment.

I wish he would give an update on his economic development plans or what is more commonly known as a letter writing campaign.

PTT said...

There old fine wino goes again, throwing around those words of slander without much conception of what they mean. Nothing slanderous there mam.

Say It Ain't So said...

Gravy,

I think you got it confused: Conlon is the one that actually had the economic and redevelopment plans, Schneider is the one who just copied her ads and pretended like he knew what he was talking about.

br549 said...

Can you site the court ruling and its stpulations?

br549 said...

Can someone recite the court ruling being referred to?